Incomplete information, proportional representation and strategic voting

نویسندگان

  • Orestis Troumpounis
  • Dimitrios Xefteris
چکیده

We introduce incomplete information to a multiparty election under proportional representation: each voter knows her preferences and votes strategically to maximize her payoffs, but is uncertain about the number and the preferences of the other voters. Parties are assumed to be purely office motivated and, hence, the resulting governments are always minimum winning. In this framework we prove a) generic existence of equilibria where only two parties receive a positive fraction of the votes and therefore lead to single party governments and b) generic inexistence of equilibria that lead to coalition governments. That is, contrary to common wisdom, a proportional rule is found not to promote sincere voting and to be favorable towards single party governments. The existence of two-party equilibria that lead to single party governments is robust to parties having ideological concerns.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Polls, coalitions and strategic voting under proportional representation

How do polls influence strategic voting under proportional representation? This paper derives a strategic calculus of voting for coalitions that generates testable predictions about the effects of polls on strategic voting in elections involving four or more parties. Incentives of leftist voters to vote for a centrist over a noncentrist party are shown to increase with the difference in expecte...

متن کامل

Party Formation and Policy Outcomes under Di ff erent Electoral Systems ∗

I introduce a simple model of representative democracy that allows for strategic parties, strategic candidates, strategic voters, and multiple districts. If the distribution of policy preferences is not too heterogeneous across and within districts, then the number of effective parties is larger under Proportional Representation than under Plurality Voting, confirming Duverger’s hypothesis, and...

متن کامل

Representing the Insincere: Strategically Robust Proportional Representation

Proportional representation (PR) is a fundamental principle of many democracies world-wide which employ PR-based voting rules to elect their representatives. Œe normative properties of these voting rules however, are o‰en only understood in the context of sincere voting. In this paper we consider PR in the presence of strategic voters. We construct a voting rule such that for every preference p...

متن کامل

Policy Stability under Di erent Electoral

This paper looks at the stability of policy outcomes under di erent electoral systems. The political game among parties and party supporters of di erent ideologies involves pre-election coalition formation as well as after-election parliamentary bargaining. Voters' preferences vary across districts and over time. We show that under proportional representation there exists a unique stable policy...

متن کامل

Strategic Voting with Incomplete Information

Classical results in social choice theory on the susceptibility of voting rules to strategic manipulation make the assumption that the manipulator has complete information regarding the preferences of the other voters. In reality, however, voters only have incomplete information, which limits their ability to manipulate. We explore how these limitations affect both the manipulability of voting ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Social Choice and Welfare

دوره 47  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016